
Over the next 20 years, thousands and thousands of major startups will be built to solve global problems. We should mold Finland into an ideal home for these companies. This way, a large part of the value generated ends up in Finland and boosts our economic growth. And that's the only way to secure the future of our precious welfare society.

A two-week service promise should be provided and secured for foreign talent and their families.
The realization of this should be measured systematically from the moment the applicant submits their application to the system.
This easy and smooth process should include identification, obtaining a work permit, and all other practical steps from opening a bank account to a personal social security code.
In addition, the identification process of a foreign specialist must be developed further and a digital identity project implemented.
Finally, service paths need to be streamlined and English-language school student slots need to be added for families of international talent.
We encourage cities to increase English-language schooling and streamline school placements. In the future, the school student slots must also be available – without any problems –in the middle of the school year. The government should investigate the possibility of creating a statutory obligation for English language studies in primary school alongside Finnish and Swedish languages.
The need for work-related immigration has become increasingly important, especially because the current Finnish labor is not sufficient enough to meet the labor needs of local companies.
We believe that startups and the technologies developed in these companies will play a crucial role in solving the global climate crisis.
Climate technology and green materials technology companies will be the next area of massive growth in the startup scene. Finland already excels in this: our strenghts lie in companies, universities and research institutes, such as VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd. The field will be significant for Finland, as long as we take effective and concrete steps toward it.
By investing in environmental technology, methods of economic production can be developed so that we do not have to choose between economic growth and environmental sustainability.
Being at the forefront of environmental technology means significant financial gains to those who are the first to develop the best innovations. A significant cluster of top environmental experts is already cumulating in Finland. This development must also be supported more systematically through public investment and international cooperation.
The definition of plastic in the SUP Directive needs to be corrected in line with the views of the scientific community. For sustainable materials that can be recycled mechanically and chemically, PPWD must ensure a recycling path in the same way as traditional plastics.
The development of health technology companies requires innovative procurement and a new kind of collaboration between startups and public healthcare.
A significant group of top environmental experts is already rising in Finland. This development must also be supported more systematically through public investment and international cooperation.

Finland needs to study tax incentives to attract international companies and experts.
We do not encourage tax competition. However, Finland needs to look at models that attract companies to establish themselves in our competitor countries. The reality is that unless Finland gets competitive, jobs will be created elsewhere and the Finnish economy gets nothing.
Taxation must be seen as a tool that, among other things:
The Finnish government should review the fiscal policy decisions of rival countries to support the creation of high-productivity jobs. In the startup field, it is important that the domestic market has time to create a critical mass of companies and jobs that work together under the same ecosystem. In order for this critical mass of companies and jobs to be created in the domestic market, fiscal policy decisions are needed to support growth.
Montreal, for example, has managed to grow a significant gaming and machine learning cluster with the help of, among other things, tax incentives. At least similar incentives should be tried more widely in Finland as well.
The Finnish startup and growth company ecosystem is going good – but “good” is not enough in this global competition. We have to be the best in the world because in this game, the best get the best talents.

Under current Finnish legislation, in tax transactions with a company located in the EU, the tax sanction does not take effect until the shares received are sold.
Finnish tax legislation should be amended so that the regulations applicable to EU regions also apply to the EFTA countries and the United States.
In connection with share arrangements made outside the EU, the current Finnish legislation obliges the owners of the acquired company to pay taxes at the time of the transaction. In practice, this is not possible in most situations and thus the current situation prevents the development of many companies through a share exchange arrangement. In these situations, the company’s development is jeopardized and slowed down, causing tax revenue losses to Finland in the longer term.
In practice, Finnish growth companies are currently unable to take full advantage of the financing opportunities offered by companies established outside the EU.